|
Index How to Present a Maintenance Case Tax Consequences of Spousal Maintenance
"Alimony"
is the term used in many states for financial support paid to a
ex-spouse after a divorce. In Wisconsin the term "alimony" has
been replaced with the term "Spousal Maintenance." The
terms are synonymous. Maintenance is most often used to provide temporary
financial support from one spouse to another when that spouse was financially dependent on the other during the marriage.
In most instances maintenance is designed to provide the necessary support for a spouse until he
or she either remarries or becomes self-supporting. In
some states, an award of alimony may be based on marital fault.
However, Wisconsin is a "no
fault" divorce state which means that perceived marital misconduct
such as infidelity or abuse are not considered in determining support
obligations. (For a guide to
Alimony in all 50 states Click
Here). Spousal Maintenance is an obligation that is
independent of child support and property settlement obligations.
Unlike
Wisconsin's child support statutes, there are no percentage guidelines
to determine when spousal maintenance is appropriate or at what level.
In Wisconsin, trial courts have broad discretion in deciding whether to
award maintenance and in determining its duration and amount. As a
result, spousal maintenance often becomes one of the most contested
issues in divorce proceedings. Currently,
Spousal Maintenance awards are granted pursuant to Wisconsin
Statutes § 767.26. Under this law the courts are guided by ten
factors that should be considered in determining a spousal maintenance
award. The factors include: One important factor in determining whether spousal maintenance is
paid and for how long is the length of the marriage. Shorter marriages
often result in no award of spousal maintenance or lesser awards. Longer
marriages may result in long term or even permanent awards. A second
important factor in determining the level of spousal maintenance is the
standard of living the parties enjoyed during the marriage. When faced
with a long term marriage (fifteen years or more), often Wisconsin trial
courts begin their evaluation of spousal maintenance with the
proposition that a spouse that is dependant on the other for financial
support is entitled to 50% of the earnings of both parties. This
is considered to be a starting point for equalizing the standard of
living for each party. If the parties
are unable to resolve disputes related to spousal maintenance, a court
may: No matter
whether spousal maintenance is awarded, denied or reserved after a
trial, the issue may be always be readdressed and spousal maintenance
modified upon a showing that there has been a substantial change in
circumstance making the original award (or denial) unreasonable or
unfair. Under most circumstances
spousal maintenance automatically terminates when one spouse dies or the
spouse receiving maintenance remarries. From a
practical standpoint, it is unlikely that a Court denying spousal
maintenance would later change that determination absent compelling
circumstances. A compelling circumstance may include a critical illness
befalling the party seeking maintenance which renders that person
incapable of working or providing for their own support. There would
also have to be a showing that the person from whom maintenance is
sought has the ability to contribute.
Temporary
awards of spousal maintenance usually dictate factual presumptions on
which the award is based. For example, maintenance may be awarded for a
period of five (5) years at a certain level predicated on the recipient
enrolling in and completed educational courses and finding employment in
that period of time. Either party may bring the matter back before the
Court if the recipient becomes self supporting at an earlier date or,
through no fault of his/her own, fails to find employment within the
designated period. Orders setting forth detailed educational and
employment time lines on which the maintenance award is based tend to
favor the person paying spousal maintenance since the recipient must
demonstrate good cause why the time lines were not followed or achieved
to extend the spousal maintenance beyond that period. There are only
one way to preclude the Court from having jurisdiction to award spousal
maintenance. Statutes relating to spousal maintenance awards
specifically allow the parties to enter into a private agreements that
preclude or limit spousal maintenance awards. These agreements may take
the form of properly executed prenuptial agreements or agreements
reached as part of the divorce proceedings.
Unfortunately,
such agreements are disfavored by Wisconsin Courts. Any court that is
asked to enforce such an agreement must determine that the stipulation
is fair and equitable and supported by adequate consideration after full
disclosure of each party’s financial circumstance.
Since the Court
determines what is fair and equitable at the time of the divorce, it is
particularly unlikely that prenuptial agreements executed many years in
advance will carry much weight. What is fair and equitable at the time
the marriage begins may not be fair and equitable when it ends.
In most cases,
the interests of persons asked to pay spousal maintenance are better
served by offering an immediate buy-out of spousal maintenance in return
for a waiver that would preclude the court from modifying spousal
maintenance in the future. This buy-out may occur as part of a property
settlement that favors the party seeking maintenance.
To determine
what amount to offer or accept as a buy-out, it is important to consider
two factors:
Imputation of
income is a harsh result where the Court requires a party to pay spousal
maintenance (or child support) based on earning capacity rather
than true income. For example, if one party quits a job and
reduces his/her income voluntarily or if a party fails to seek gainful
employment though able-bodied, the Court may base that person’s income
on earning capacity. Oftentimes, the parson’s prior work history plays
a pivotal role in determining what they have the ability to earn. Documents
that may be presented to the Court regarding earning capacity
include: To determine the
skill level of a spouse seeking spousal maintenance, it may be necessary
to have a vocational evaluation performed. If requested by a party, it
is likely that a Court will require the party seeking spousal
maintenance to cooperate with such an assessment.
A vocational
evaluation is conducted by a Qualified Rehabilitative Consultant (QRC).
During the evaluation stage, the QRC will administer a series of
questionnaires designed to highlight the vocational strengths and
weaknesses of the party being tested. With theses test results, the QRC
examines the fields of employment in which the person examined is likely
to have the most success. The evaluation also analyzes the past work and
educational history of the individual as well as that person’s
employment goals. After the
evaluation has been performed, the QRC drafts a report that identifies
the fields in which the tested person has demonstrated strengths. The
report then analyzes the field to determine what additional education is
necessary, if any; the likely period of time for completing that
education; the costs associated with the education; and the likely wage
that the tested person is likely to achieve after education and
training. The results of a
vocational evaluation may be challenged at trial. However, these
independent experts hold great sway with the Court in determining the
amount and duration of spousal maintenance awards.
As previously
stated, some relevant factors considered by the court in deciding
whether to award spousal maintenance include the finances of the
parties, the education levels of the parties, the work histories of the
parties, the health of the parties and the standard of living the
parties established during the marriage. In order to properly document
these issues at trial you should provide the following:
Spousal Maintenance also raises a myriad of tax issues that must be
considered. In
deciding whether to “buy-out” the other party’s spousal
maintenance, it is important to consider all of the potential tax
consequences.
|