|
| A recent case (decided December 27, 2001) shows how YOU, not the government, bear the burden to prove entitlement to divorce-related tax breaks. In this case, the taxpayer struck out on all three breaks: head of household, child exemptions, and earned income credit.
The taxpayer was the father of three, or so ruled a California court when the mother sued to prove paternity. OK, so I'm the father, said Dad, now I get all those tax benefits. Not so fast, said the Tax Court. You “did not submit any evidence” that you provided over half the cost of maintaining his home as a household for any of the kids. Therefore, no head of household relief. Note that the court focused on the father's failure to “submit evidence.” The burden is always on you to prove entitlement to a tax break. How about dependency exemptions? He claimed three, but the court allowed none. Again, the father was required to prove that he provided more than half of each child's support for the taxable year, and “by competent evidence.” That means he had to show what the TOTAL support was, and then his portion. Again, “no evidence” meant no exemptions. True enough, the County had picked up the slack on child support by paying to the mom where dad did not. But that's not “child support” under the tax laws. YOU, not the County, have to pay. Earned income credit? The child must be your child. No problem there, since dad was adjudicated the father in a paternity suit. The kids must also be under age 19. But again, the dad failed “to establish that [the kids] shared petitioner's residence…” for more than half the year. So, strike three for this delinquent dad. All of which goes to show that if you're going to claim tax breaks for your children, it's best to keep every scrap of paper that will show they depended on your, that you provided for their support, and that you provided a home. |
|
Suggest this page to a friend. © 2001 LawTek Media Group, LLC |
This website and the linked publications
contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed
to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter
covered. Any references to products or services do not constitute
or imply an endorsement or recommendation. The advice or
discussion presented in this website or linked publications are
not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute
the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise
of any type. The publisher and the author(s) specifically
disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial,
personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence,
directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of
the contents of this website or the linked publications.
Information on this website and linked publications is provided
"as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express
or implied. All intellectual property, including without
limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property
of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly
prohibited. Any person is hereby authorized to view the
information available on this website for informational purposes
only. No part of the information on this site may be used,
redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written
consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC. Linked
websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek
Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about
any other website (or information found therein) which you may
access through this website. Links are provided only as
a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements
or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or
the use of such website.
|