|Home| |Site Map| |Chat| |List of Forums| |Search Site|

Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath, Esq.


"Dealing with "Gray" Areas on Your Tax Return"

-
Week of 12/10/01 -
Ever have one of these? Something that's not clear as to the tax treatment? It happens ALL the time. Example: You suffer a business loss but you're not sure if it's fully deductible. Or, you get an insurance settlement and you're not sure if it's taxable at all. Or, you sell a stock, but you are not sure what the tax basis is (and therefore what the taxable gain or loss is).

What to do in such a situation. Some people play ostrich: Forget the deduction. Others take it but try to hide it. Still others put it on some "miscellaneous" line they find somewhere on the return.

Usually, the best course of action is to put the item exactly where you think it belongs IF you had all the information, and if there is some guesswork involved, the tax laws make allowances for dealing with that. For example: Your business loss from your small corporation is not well documented, or you are not sure if money you transferred to that corporation should be considered a "business bad debt" or "non-business bad debt" (ordinary or capital loss). There are very common "gray" areas where the tax laws are simply not clear. Where they are clear, the FACTS may be fuzzy.

Reporting the loss (in the example above) as an ordinary loss is certainly permissible if you have a reasonable basis for taking that position (on the facts and the law) and act in good faith. To lessen the chances of a penalty if the IRS disallows the loss, you should do as much factual and legal research as you can to document the loss (or other item in question) and put that on paper for your file.

Also consider filing Form 8275 with your return. This is a disclosure form for items as to which the tax treatment is not clear. (Yes, the IRS has an official form for gray areas.) That form asks some specific questions and then provides space for an explanation of the item. The IRS officially takes the position that filing Form 8275 does NOT increase the chance of an audit. But if the return is selected anyway, the form does allow the agent to focus on the issue where he/she might not have picked it up otherwise.

And, the big advantage of Form 8275 is that it is insurance against the "substantial understatement" of tax penalty. Moreover, you can argue against other proposed penalties, such as negligence, by holding out the form to the agent as an example of how you tried to do the right thing.

Not all gray issues require this form. Most items on Schedule C and Schedule A, and other common deductions as well, are automatically "disclosed" just by reporting them accurately on the required forms.

So consider a little "official confession" on some items when preparing your tax returns for this year.


Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath

FAMILY LAW Advisor® HOME PAGE

Suggest this page to a friend.

© 2001 LawTek Media Group, LLC
all rights reserved

This website and the linked publications contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter covered.  Any references to products or services do not constitute or imply an endorsement or recommendation.  The advice or discussion presented in this website or linked publications are not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise of any type.  The publisher and the author(s) specifically disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial, personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of the contents of this website or the linked publications.  Information on this website and linked publications is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.  All intellectual property, including without limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly prohibited.  Any person is hereby authorized to view the information available on this website for informational purposes only.  No part of the information on this site may be used, redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC.  Linked websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about any other website (or information found therein) which you may access through this website.  Links are provided only as a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or the use of such website.

IN NO EVENT WILL MR. NATH BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WITH ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ON ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY LOST PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF PROGRAMS OR OTHER DATA ON YOUR INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF WE ARE EXPRESSLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.  THE ENTIRE RISK ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION FOUND HEREIN REMAINS WITH THE RECIPIENT.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE AND ANY LINKED WEBSITE OR PUBLICATIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, THE USER OR READER AGREES IN ADVANCE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO SUCH USE.

No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.
http://www.divorcenet.com/qday/tax97.html