|Home| |Site Map| |Chat| |List of Forums| |Search Site|

Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath, Esq.


"Long-Term Offers in Compromise"

-
Week of 12/03/01 -
Okay, you've decided to settle your past due tax debt with the IRS, and you've heard about the Offer in Compromise program. What if you can't pay the amount the examiner recommends for acceptance?

The solution is to consider two alternatives to the “lump sum” offer. In the usual offer, you request to pay within a certain time (up to 90 days) from the date the offer is accepted. That lump sum payment is normally the best for your situation, because it ends everything: the tax is marked “paid,” the lien is released, credit agencies are notified (by IRS if you ask - it's a new statutory right).

But in the real world, MANY MANY offers fail because of one part of the calculations: the “future income potential” component. This is the amount the IRS calculates you can pay over time, given your income and the allowable expenses against that income (page 6 of Form 433-A). A high “net” available income means a high lump sum offer, since the premise is that the IRS is taking as a lump sum the present value of that stream of payments over time.

What to do? Stretch out those payments. The first choice is over two years (a “short term deferred payment” offer). That will cost you more, typically 12 times the monthly net available income, but maybe this works for you. After all, two years of payment can often be more tolerable than an unswallowable lump sum.

What if that does not work? Then there is something called the “deferred payment offer.” In this type of offer, you offer to pay the net (along with a lump sum representing your net equity in assets) over the remainder of the period of limitations on collection. That is normally worse for you, since the lien remains in place and there is a danger of default. But if a lump sum or a 2-year payout is simply not feasible, the deferred payment offer may be the way to go. Essentially it's an “all you can pay for a term of years,” but it may be better than forced collection or full payment.

So consider three alternative payment arrangements when you make your offer in compromise to the IRS.


Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath

FAMILY LAW Advisor® HOME PAGE

Suggest this page to a friend.

© 2001 LawTek Media Group, LLC
all rights reserved

This website and the linked publications contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter covered.  Any references to products or services do not constitute or imply an endorsement or recommendation.  The advice or discussion presented in this website or linked publications are not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise of any type.  The publisher and the author(s) specifically disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial, personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of the contents of this website or the linked publications.  Information on this website and linked publications is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.  All intellectual property, including without limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly prohibited.  Any person is hereby authorized to view the information available on this website for informational purposes only.  No part of the information on this site may be used, redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC.  Linked websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about any other website (or information found therein) which you may access through this website.  Links are provided only as a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or the use of such website.

IN NO EVENT WILL MR. NATH BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WITH ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ON ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY LOST PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF PROGRAMS OR OTHER DATA ON YOUR INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF WE ARE EXPRESSLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.  THE ENTIRE RISK ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION FOUND HEREIN REMAINS WITH THE RECIPIENT.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE AND ANY LINKED WEBSITE OR PUBLICATIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, THE USER OR READER AGREES IN ADVANCE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO SUCH USE.

No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.
http://www.divorcenet.com/qday/tax96.html