|
|
"Confusion" is a word often associated with "taxes," and a good example is the area of dependency exemption and head of household status. Many divorced or separated couples see an overlap between these two categories, so it may be useful to review the rules.
A married couple can claim a child as a dependent if, among other things, they together provide more than half of the child's “support.” That term takes into account many factors, including cash paid for support and the fair value of non-cash items (such as the value of rent in some cases.) When a couple separates, there is a special rule allocating the dependency exemption to the “custodial” parent, regardless of which one actually contributes more than half the support. Also, the parents must be in the physical custody of one or both parents for more than half the year (i.e., Aunt Gertrude doesn't count), the parents must be divorced or legally separated, and the parents must have lived apart for the last six months of the calendar year. Another special rule provides that the divorced couple can allocate the exemption as they wish, if they both agree. Contrast all that with the head of household requirements. To qualify as head of household, you must be unmarried (or deemed unmarried) as of the end of the year, you must maintain, for over half the year, a home that constitutes the principal residence of a “qualified person”, that is, someone who could be your dependent, and you must pay over half the expenses of maintaining that home. So, you can fail the head of household test (say, because your ex provides more than half the expenses) but still have a dependent (because you have custody). You must parse these rules in each case to determine whether you qualify. |
|
Suggest this page to a friend. © 2001 LawTek Media Group, LLC |
This website and the linked publications
contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed
to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter
covered. Any references to products or services do not constitute
or imply an endorsement or recommendation. The advice or
discussion presented in this website or linked publications are
not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute
the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise
of any type. The publisher and the author(s) specifically
disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial,
personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence,
directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of
the contents of this website or the linked publications.
Information on this website and linked publications is provided
"as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express
or implied. All intellectual property, including without
limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property
of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly
prohibited. Any person is hereby authorized to view the
information available on this website for informational purposes
only. No part of the information on this site may be used,
redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written
consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC. Linked
websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek
Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about
any other website (or information found therein) which you may
access through this website. Links are provided only as
a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements
or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or
the use of such website.
|