|
|
That's a lesson an ex-wife learned, the hard way, in a recent Tax Court case. She got stuck with income taxes for money she had received from her ex-husband, a retired military man, under a divorce decree. The case, in showing how to do it wrong, also points the way to do it right.
The couple got into difficulties after the husband retired (lesson there?). They signed a divorce decree which provided, in part, that the payments to the wife were a “property settlement.” That was enough, she argued, for the payments to be non-“alimony” and therefore excludable from gross income. The tax law used to provide other rules for determining whether payments like this were taxable alimony. It depended on the intent of the parties, not some objective standard. So Congress changed the law in 1984, providing strict, objective rules for alimony treatment. One of those rules was that the divorce or separation decree did not specifically designate the payments as being excludable from income. If it did, then the payments were excludable. If it did not, they were taxable. In the case, the Court ruled that simply calling payments “property settlement” was not enough to take the payments out of “alimony” land. The lesson? Be specific. State in the decree that the payments are not intended to be alimony, or language like that. It's not hard; the Internal Revenue Code gives you the formula. But the result in the case in court was correct: the specificity Congress required was lacking. Moreover, the result was fair: the husband had deducted the payments, as “alimony.” |
|
Suggest this page to a friend. © 2000 LawTek Media Group, LLC |
This website and the linked publications
contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed
to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter
covered. Any references to products or services do not constitute
or imply an endorsement or recommendation. The advice or
discussion presented in this website or linked publications are
not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute
the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise
of any type. The publisher and the author(s) specifically
disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial,
personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence,
directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of
the contents of this website or the linked publications.
Information on this website and linked publications is provided
"as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express
or implied. All intellectual property, including without
limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property
of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly
prohibited. Any person is hereby authorized to view the
information available on this website for informational purposes
only. No part of the information on this site may be used,
redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written
consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC. Linked
websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek
Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about
any other website (or information found therein) which you may
access through this website. Links are provided only as
a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements
or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or
the use of such website.
|