|Home| |Site Map| |Chat| |List of Forums| |Search Site|

Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath, Esq.


“Alimony is not a question of intent”

-
Week of 12/18/00 -
That's a lesson an ex-wife learned, the hard way, in a recent Tax Court case. She got stuck with income taxes for money she had received from her ex-husband, a retired military man, under a divorce decree. The case, in showing how to do it wrong, also points the way to do it right.

The couple got into difficulties after the husband retired (lesson there?). They signed a divorce decree which provided, in part, that the payments to the wife were a “property settlement.” That was enough, she argued, for the payments to be non-“alimony” and therefore excludable from gross income.

The tax law used to provide other rules for determining whether payments like this were taxable alimony. It depended on the intent of the parties, not some objective standard. So Congress changed the law in 1984, providing strict, objective rules for alimony treatment. One of those rules was that the divorce or separation decree did not specifically designate the payments as being excludable from income. If it did, then the payments were excludable. If it did not, they were taxable. In the case, the Court ruled that simply calling payments “property settlement” was not enough to take the payments out of “alimony” land.

The lesson? Be specific. State in the decree that the payments are not intended to be alimony, or language like that. It's not hard; the Internal Revenue Code gives you the formula.

But the result in the case in court was correct: the specificity Congress required was lacking. Moreover, the result was fair: the husband had deducted the payments, as “alimony.”


Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath

FAMILY LAW Advisor® HOME PAGE

Suggest this page to a friend.

© 2000 LawTek Media Group, LLC
all rights reserved

This website and the linked publications contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter covered.  Any references to products or services do not constitute or imply an endorsement or recommendation.  The advice or discussion presented in this website or linked publications are not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise of any type.  The publisher and the author(s) specifically disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial, personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of the contents of this website or the linked publications.  Information on this website and linked publications is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.  All intellectual property, including without limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly prohibited.  Any person is hereby authorized to view the information available on this website for informational purposes only.  No part of the information on this site may be used, redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC.  Linked websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about any other website (or information found therein) which you may access through this website.  Links are provided only as a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or the use of such website.

IN NO EVENT WILL MR. NATH BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WITH ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ON ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY LOST PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF PROGRAMS OR OTHER DATA ON YOUR INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF WE ARE EXPRESSLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.  THE ENTIRE RISK ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION FOUND HEREIN REMAINS WITH THE RECIPIENT.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE AND ANY LINKED WEBSITE OR PUBLICATIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, THE USER OR READER AGREES IN ADVANCE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO SUCH USE.

No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.
http://www.divorcenet.com/qday/tax50.html