|Home| |Site Map| |Chat| |List of Forums| |Search Site|

Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath, Esq.


"When property is split, is there a tax?"

-
Week of 7/15/02 -
The following question suggests the issue of what happens to inherent taxes when property is divided in a divorce:

“I am recently divorced. My husband continues to live in our house (he owned it before we married) I received a lump sum of 30g for the house equity I was entitled to. Is this taxable income to me? Do I have to claim it all at once?”

The answer is that neither the transfer of cash to the wife nor the transfer of her interest in the house to her husband is taxable. That's the good news. The bad news is that taxes come later.

The tax law (Section 1041 of the Internal Revenue Code) provides the general rule that “no gain or loss” is recognized when spouses transfer property “incident to a divorce.” The transfers are treated as gifts. So in the example above, it's as if husband made a gift of $30,000 to wife, and wife made a gift of her interest in the house to husband. The wife pays no tax, ever, on that gift (it's cash). The husband, however, may pay tax when he sells the house. That's because the tax “basis” of the wife's interest in the house carries over to the period of his ownership. For example, if the house cost $160,000, the wife's basis would be $80,000. That carries over. So when husband eventually sells the house, there could be a gain.

The “no current tax” rule described above applies to all transfers of “property” between spouses incident to divorce, and is mandatory. The couple has no option to treat the transfers as a sale. The rule applies to losses as well, with some exceptions. So if husband transfers loss property to wife, and then she sells it, in general she can take the loss. (But there are some tricky rules here; check with your advisor.)

The tax regulations require that the transferor provide to the transferee sufficient records to allow the transferee to determine the tax basis and holding period of the property transferred. Often this is a problem in a divorce, but since the regulations require it, you have one additional argument for insisting on property and complete documentation.


Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath

FAMILY LAW Advisor® HOME PAGE

Suggest this page to a friend.

© 2002 LawTek Media Group, LLC
all rights reserved

This website and the linked publications contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter covered.  Any references to products or services do not constitute or imply an endorsement or recommendation.  The advice or discussion presented in this website or linked publications are not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise of any type.  The publisher and the author(s) specifically disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial, personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of the contents of this website or the linked publications.  Information on this website and linked publications is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.  All intellectual property, including without limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly prohibited.  Any person is hereby authorized to view the information available on this website for informational purposes only.  No part of the information on this site may be used, redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC.  Linked websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about any other website (or information found therein) which you may access through this website.  Links are provided only as a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or the use of such website.

IN NO EVENT WILL MR. NATH BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WITH ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ON ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY LOST PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF PROGRAMS OR OTHER DATA ON YOUR INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF WE ARE EXPRESSLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.  THE ENTIRE RISK ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION FOUND HEREIN REMAINS WITH THE RECIPIENT.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE AND ANY LINKED WEBSITE OR PUBLICATIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, THE USER OR READER AGREES IN ADVANCE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO SUCH USE.

No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.
http://www.divorcenet.com/qday/tax127.html