|Home| |Site Map| |Chat| |List of Forums| |Search Site|

Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath, Esq.


"Innocent Spouse Can Survive Even If You Don't"

-
Week of 5/06/02 -
It's widely known that the recently (1998) enacted innocent spouse provisions were intended to liberalize the law in this area. And, in fact, they did. Traditional innocent spouse status is now somewhat easier to prove than in the past. Moreover, there is a new provision, which helps people who cannot prove innocent spouse status. This is the “separate liability election,” which in theory enables you to split your income from that of your less-than-innocent spouse.

But Section 6015 of the Internal Revenue Code, which embodies these provisions, does not state what happens if the “innocent” spouse passes away. Can his or her spouse still claim the benefits? Yes, says the IRS (apparently relying on the liberal spirit of the new law). In a technical advice memo from the Chief Counsel (the IRS' top lawyers), the IRS now says that the surviving spouse can pursue the claim even if the statute does not specifically provide for such relief. That's because executors and administrators of estates have a “myriad of election options” available to them. These relate to almost every aspect of a decedent's income and taxes. There is no policy reason why an executor or administrator should be barred from asserting innocent spouse relief, and in fact now they can do so.

This new advice contradicts some decisions to the contrary that had been published, but on a lower (“field advice”) level. As a result, in those cases where an innocent spouse passes away, the claim is still available.

This is important to many surviving spouses because if Spouse 1 dies owing federal taxes, those taxes become a claim against the spouse's estate. They do NOT disappear. Many assets of Spouse 1 therefore become subject to this tax claim, to the detriment of Spouse 2 and the children. Now, Spouse 2 can pursue the innocent spouse claim and perhaps save money for the estate and the beneficiaries.

Proving innocent spouse status is still unchanged. The new IRS advice makes no statement on HOW to prove the case, only that the defense is available despite the death of the spouse who could claim innocence.


Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath

FAMILY LAW Advisor® HOME PAGE

Suggest this page to a friend.

© 2002 LawTek Media Group, LLC
all rights reserved

This website and the linked publications contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter covered.  Any references to products or services do not constitute or imply an endorsement or recommendation.  The advice or discussion presented in this website or linked publications are not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise of any type.  The publisher and the author(s) specifically disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial, personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of the contents of this website or the linked publications.  Information on this website and linked publications is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.  All intellectual property, including without limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly prohibited.  Any person is hereby authorized to view the information available on this website for informational purposes only.  No part of the information on this site may be used, redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC.  Linked websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about any other website (or information found therein) which you may access through this website.  Links are provided only as a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or the use of such website.

IN NO EVENT WILL MR. NATH BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WITH ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ON ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY LOST PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF PROGRAMS OR OTHER DATA ON YOUR INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF WE ARE EXPRESSLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.  THE ENTIRE RISK ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION FOUND HEREIN REMAINS WITH THE RECIPIENT.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE AND ANY LINKED WEBSITE OR PUBLICATIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, THE USER OR READER AGREES IN ADVANCE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO SUCH USE.

No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.
http://www.divorcenet.com/qday/tax117.html