|
| Who said the IRS was now TOTALLY nice? Yes, MOSTLY, but a recent Tax Court case shows the message has not reached every brain. But there's good news - the taxpayer won! And, she represented herself in court!
Karen and Dean were married in 1980. They had two sons by 1984. Then the discord started and both wound up in divorce court. Karen got the kids, and the court ordered Dean to pay $400 per month in child support. If he did (“all child support”), he got the tax exemption. But he didn't. So Karen took him back to divorce court. The court held him in contempt and threw him in jail. Suddenly, Dean saw the light and paid $15,000 in back payments. But that was still not full payment. By this time it was 1996. Karen filed her tax return, claimed her two sons and a child care credit. The IRS disallowed the exemptions, claiming Dean, not Karen, was entitled to them under the divorce decree. How much was at stake here? The princely sum of $2,134. THAT's how much the IRS wanted from Karen. Now, let's pause to absorb the full picture: Dean and Karen divorce. Karen raises the boys, with all the hassles that effort entails. Dean balks; Karen has to go back to court and get him thrown in jail to squeeze out a payment. Dean pays but not in full, leaving Karen $15,000 short. And the IRS goes after…KAREN! (Maybe their case selection standards could use a little oil, no?) Unbowed, Karen took the IRS to court. The IRS was represented by an attorney. Karen was not. Who won? Yes, Karen won. The court said she got the exemptions because Dean didn't pay ALL the child support, and his entitlement was conditioned on that. Karen got the child credit too because she was entitled to the two exemptions. So, justice triumphed. The sad part is that Karen had to go to court at all, and over so small a sum. The lesson: Watch the details. Be careful when you enter into divorce decrees, to ensure an enforcement mechanism. |
|
Suggest this page to a friend. © 2002 LawTek Media Group, LLC |
This website and the linked publications
contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed
to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter
covered. Any references to products or services do not constitute
or imply an endorsement or recommendation. The advice or
discussion presented in this website or linked publications are
not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute
the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise
of any type. The publisher and the author(s) specifically
disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial,
personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence,
directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of
the contents of this website or the linked publications.
Information on this website and linked publications is provided
"as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express
or implied. All intellectual property, including without
limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property
of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly
prohibited. Any person is hereby authorized to view the
information available on this website for informational purposes
only. No part of the information on this site may be used,
redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written
consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC. Linked
websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek
Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about
any other website (or information found therein) which you may
access through this website. Links are provided only as
a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements
or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or
the use of such website.
|