|Home| |Site Map| |Chat| |List of Forums| |Search Site|

Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath, Esq.


"Due Process - There's a Right and a Wrong Way"

-
Week of 3/18/02 -
One of the cornerstones of the 1998 tax reform legislation was a new taxpayer right, the right to a “Collection Due Process Hearing.” Form 12151 is used to request this right, which follows after 1-4 IRS notices, of increasing urgency, to PAY YOUR TAXES - OR ELSE! If you lose at the hearing, you can take the matter to federal court.

This right is especially useful in collection proceedings involving spouses who are left without major assets following the filing of joint returns and a divorce. Often the “innocent” spouse signed the return but is not eligible for formal innocent spouse relief. So he/she is left to face the IRS Collection Division. This right to a hearing is an excellent way to prevent an unknowing collection disaster.

However, what you may not do is to use the collection due process hearing solely for delay. In a recent case, that's what happened, or at least the judge came close to saying so. The taxpayer racked up seven years of tax delinquencies, totaling $700,000, and then filed the hearing request when the IRS was about to levy on assets. Compucel Service Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (USDC D-Md.)

The Judge (a former Tax Division, US Justice Department attorney) saw right through that ploy. The law itself, the judge said, “permits a taxpayer who does not deny that he owes a tax liability to block IRS collection by levy for so long as it may take to provide a Due Process Hearing and for the judicial process to be completed.” If you file for a hearing in good faith because the IRS is threatening unfair collection, that's OK. But here, the Court said, that appeared not to be the case.

The Court threw out the case, holding that the IRS was free to levy, that there was no requirement for a transcript at the due process hearing, that a record of the arguments for both sides was sufficient, that there was no requirement that the IRS make any compromise, and that the IRS' decision at the hearing was reversible only for “abuse of discretion.”

So when you consider filing for a collection due process hearing, remember that throughout the law, including IRS matters, there is a requirement of acting in good faith. Use the CDP hearing as a last resort; try to work things out with Collection at the earliest time and lowest level.


Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath

FAMILY LAW Advisor® HOME PAGE

Suggest this page to a friend.

© 2002 LawTek Media Group, LLC
all rights reserved

This website and the linked publications contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter covered.  Any references to products or services do not constitute or imply an endorsement or recommendation.  The advice or discussion presented in this website or linked publications are not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise of any type.  The publisher and the author(s) specifically disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial, personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of the contents of this website or the linked publications.  Information on this website and linked publications is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.  All intellectual property, including without limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly prohibited.  Any person is hereby authorized to view the information available on this website for informational purposes only.  No part of the information on this site may be used, redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC.  Linked websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about any other website (or information found therein) which you may access through this website.  Links are provided only as a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or the use of such website.

IN NO EVENT WILL MR. NATH BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WITH ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ON ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY LOST PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF PROGRAMS OR OTHER DATA ON YOUR INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF WE ARE EXPRESSLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.  THE ENTIRE RISK ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION FOUND HEREIN REMAINS WITH THE RECIPIENT.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE AND ANY LINKED WEBSITE OR PUBLICATIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, THE USER OR READER AGREES IN ADVANCE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO SUCH USE.

No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.
http://www.divorcenet.com/qday/tax110.html