|Home| |Site Map| |Chat| |List of Forums| |Search Site|

Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath, Esq.


Thank you for your "support"

-
Week of 3/11/02 -
To merit a tax exemption for your child, you must (among other requirements) provide more than half of the dependent's “support.” That much is generally well known. However, several nuances of the “support” test are not so well known, especially in a divorce context.

Who must provide that support? One or both parents? It's both, so if both together provide more than half the support, that test is met. Sometimes another person (grandparent, for example) will provide support. If it's more than half, the support test is not met unless it's done under a “multiple support agreement.”

What if the child earns money on his/her own, or has other income? That does not matter, even if the extra income is high. What counts is who actually contributed to the support. For example, if Junior needs $5,000 per year for his support, Divorced Mom and Dad must contribute more than $2,500. If Junior has a $1 million trust fund, and uses no part of it for support, M&D still pass the support test. A specific rule in the tax code excludes scholarship money from the support test.

How do you value “support?” For cash items, it's of course the actual cash outlay. (Divorcing couples should keep very accurate receipts, down to the penny, for every item of support.) For non-cash items, such as housing, it's the fair rental value of the lodging. To prove that, you may consider scanning (and clipping) rental notices from the paper for similar properties, or any other method that proves the value of your lodging. Extras such as summer school, summer camp, outings, etc. are normally counted in support.

But even if Parent 1 provides 99.9% of support, Parent 2 can still claim the exemption in a divorce situation if Parent 2 is the custodial parent and other legal requirements are met. This is a special rule in the divorce context. Note that couples can agree to allocate the exemption to P1 or P2 by using Form 8332. The term “custodial” parent here means the parent having custody for the greater part of the calendar year. Again you need proof if there is an issue. Keep a log, notes, or anything else that makes sense.

So in all the chaos of divorce, it's wise to pay attention to the details.


Tax Brake with Robert G. Nath

FAMILY LAW Advisor® HOME PAGE

Suggest this page to a friend.

© 2002 LawTek Media Group, LLC
all rights reserved

This website and the linked publications contain the opinions and ideas of its author(s) and are designed to provide useful discussion to the reader on the subject matter covered.  Any references to products or services do not constitute or imply an endorsement or recommendation.  The advice or discussion presented in this website or linked publications are not intended for use by any particular person and do not constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, financial, or other advise of any type.  The publisher and the author(s) specifically disclaim any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk (financial, personal or otherwise) which may be claimed or incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and/or application of any of the contents of this website or the linked publications.  Information on this website and linked publications is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.  All intellectual property, including without limitation trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights, are the property of Robert G. Nath, Esq. and any unauthorized use thereof is strictly prohibited.  Any person is hereby authorized to view the information available on this website for informational purposes only.  No part of the information on this site may be used, redistributed, copied or reproduced without the prior written consent of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC.  Linked websites are not under the control of Mr. Robert Nath or LawTek Media Group, LLC and no representation whatsoever is made about any other website (or information found therein) which you may access through this website.  Links are provided only as a convenience and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsements or acceptance of any liabilith whatsoever for the contents or the use of such website.

IN NO EVENT WILL MR. NATH BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WITH ANY USE OF THIS WEBSITE, OR ON ANY OTHER LINKED WEBSITE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY LOST PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF PROGRAMS OR OTHER DATA ON YOUR INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF WE ARE EXPRESSLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.  THE ENTIRE RISK ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION FOUND HEREIN REMAINS WITH THE RECIPIENT.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE AND ANY LINKED WEBSITE OR PUBLICATIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, THE USER OR READER AGREES IN ADVANCE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO SUCH USE.

No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.
http://www.divorcenet.com/qday/tax109.html