| J.
Dennis Casty, CPA, CFP®
J.
Dennis Casty is President of FinPlan Co. of Evanston,
IL and creator of the Divorce Planner® software program
- a nationally recognized software program used by attorneys,
financial professionals and Courts to facilitate financial
analysis of divorce. Dennis is a CPA licensed in Illinois
and a Certified Financial Planner as well as a member of
the AICPA and the IL CPA Society.
Dennis
is a frequent speaker at national and state bar meetings
on how computers can assist family lawyers in financial
planning for divorce. He has written several articles on
divorce tax planning which have been published in both
Fair$hare and ABA Family Advocate and has also served as
a lecturer for ABA meetings on the tax impacts of divorce.
|
|
|
Tip
of the Month:
Never Use a Pay Stub to Estimate Taxes in Divorce
If you want your assessment of the impact of support
to reflect post-divorce reality, tax computations in divorce analysis
should not rely on the taxes shown on a pay stub. Taxes shown on
a pay stub are almost always significantly overstated when used
in divorce analysis. In states where child support is based on
the net after-tax income of one or both parents, using pay stub
taxes will most likely result in understated child support. The
key to understanding this is to realize that taxes will
change considerably when the individual gets divorced and taxes
usually
are lower after divorce in the more typical family situation in
which both parties are employed.
Previous Tax Tips have discussed the lowering of post-divorce
taxes due to the elimination of the “marriage tax
penalty” which
means that additional taxes are paid just because married couples
are forced to file as Married, Joint instead of two persons who
could file as Single. Even if we assume the pay stub taxes are
generally consistent with the actual taxes to be paid (a fairly
big assumption given the complexity of the IRS W-4 form for establishing
tax withholding), the taxes reflected on the pay stub are based
on a married filing situation. Tax analysis in divorce
must be forward looking reflecting the tax situation post-divorce which
will be materially different for most individuals. In addition
to using different tax tables (Single & Head of Household), there
may be credits available to the divorcing individual which were
not available to that person when married. A married couple
with joint income of $50,000 may not even know about an Earned
Income Credit (EIC) because their joint income was too high to
use it pre-divorce. After divorce the custodial parent may be eligible
for an EIC of up to $4,000.
Pay stubs based on existing W-4s will not incorporate alimony
(maintenance payments) as a deduction for the payer or income to
the receiver because amounts will not be known until the divorce
or temporary order for support have been completed. Mortgage interest
and real estate taxes may not be available after the divorce if
the marital home is to be sold.
Finally, pay stub deductions can be manipulated by the individual
and can be changed in divorce situations so that the pay stub taxes
may not be reflective of the actual taxes to be paid but instead
of what an individual would like you to think the taxes are.
Circular
E Taxes
Many of you already know all of the above and you may take
the time to estimate divorce taxes by applying the tax tables
used
in the IRS Circular E to the gross income of the divorcing individual.
Circular E also has a lot of problems as an estimating tool in
divorce. Pay stub tax tables provided in Circular E are available
only for the Single and Married, Joint filing status. As show
in last month’s Tax Tip, the Head of Household and even
Married, filing Separate filing status are important in divorce.
The IRS methodology for estimating Head of Household (1 additional
deduction allowance – revenue is reduced by $3,050) is
only an approximation which is OK at lower income levels and
insufficient as income increases. Using this methodology, taxes
are off by $100 at $25,000 of income and this minor error increases
as income rises – taxes are off by $1,100 at $50,000 of
income and $1,800 at $100,000 of income. Finally, you may be
able to estimate taxes on regular income based on Circular E
but you also need to look at credits which have become very important
in divorce analysis. The main credits in divorce are the Child
Care Credit, the Under Age 17 Child Tax Credit and the Earned
Income Credit. These are more difficult to estimate since some
are refundable or partially refundable (get money back even if
there is no tax liability) while others can only be used to reduce
actual taxes to be paid.
Circular E tax tables are readily available but these tax tables
are not the actual tax tables used when tax returns are filed.
The Circular E tax tables are designed by the IRS to withhold more
tax than is needed so that individuals do not owe money to the
IRS when tax returns are filed but instead the IRS will refund
extra tax withholding to the individual.
IRS
Publication 919 (How Do I Adjust My Tax Withholding?)
contains the actual tax tables for the current year and is available at
the IRS website. Tax computations using Pub 919 will be more accurate
than those using Circular E and should be used by family lawyers
to manually compute taxes in divorce analysis. Computer software
is available to assist family lawyers who prefer to integrate the
tax, alimony and child support computations in one simple package.
|