An article written by Robert C. Pozen appeared in the
July 31, 2006 Wall Street Journal outlining upcoming
changes in both defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution
(DC) retirement Plans that will affect all of us who deal
with retirement benefits and divorces. Congress is about
to mandate new funding rules for DB plans (pensions) resulting
in very few private pension plans in the future. Also,
are changes to DC plans (i.e., 401(k) plans) that increase
their attractiveness and increase the annual amounts that
individuals and companies can contribute to them. These
changes make participation in these plans much more likely
to be embraced by younger workers, who currently shun them.
These plans are portable, so if you change jobs you take
them with you. Other changes will encourage low income
families to be participants in DC plans with the government
giving tax credits as motivation. Saving the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corp. (PBGC) from bankruptcy is a primary motive
for the changes.
So what does this mean to you, the practitioner? In the
future the majority of your clients will have gotten married
with a DC plan balance that precedes the marriage. In most
States you are going to have to segregate the passive growth
on the premarital portion before you can identify the marital
portion. This is hard work. I know. I prepare “Growth Analysis
Reports” to identify the marital portion of the account.
Every investment firm uses a different and constantly changing
report format. Figuring out the passive growth on a pre-marital
account for a 15 year marriage is lengthy and rarely are
all the statements available. Right now, the plans refuse
to provide copies. There must be changes that require the
companies to keep and provide copies of these statements
if every other divorce has to utilize them as a valuation
tool. These reports can be costly as well as time consuming
(we have computerized the calculations but just pulling
the numbers off of the quarterly statements can be very
tedious and a report explaining what was done must always
be written).
These changes will not affect public employee pension
plans, nor probably many Union backed plans, but private
companies will begin immediately abandoning pension plans
and converting them to cash balance plans, frozen DB plans
or taking the actuarial value and converting it to a DC
plan to avoid the new DB rules. The biggest impact will
be the additional cost to the client who has to pay for
the analysis, making the divorce more expensive.
Is “Winning” A Divorce
Case A Legitimate Goal?
An attorney friend of mine once told me he saw his role
as that of a “hired gunfighter”. He was hired to win
the case for his client no matter what the circumstances
were. The rightness or wrongness of his goal was of little
interest to him. Winning was all that mattered. This
might be an exaggeration but it is not far from the mindset
of most attorneys who are litigators, which most divorce
attorneys have to be. They have winning hammered into
their heads in law school and every case becomes a personal
challenge.
Unfortunately this is contrary to the goals of most
divorce legislation, whether it is an equitable distribution
or community property state. In a divorce case, the intent
is to identify the marital assets and to make sure your
client gets his or her equal share. Fault is not a factor
in most States so who did what to who should really have
no bearing (but as we all know it is often impossible
to overlook).
Retirement assets make up a substantial portion of the
marital property in many divorces. So naturally, getting
your client their rightful share should be one of your
primary goals. This takes knowledge on your part of how
pensions and retirement accounts are accrued, how they
pay out, what the available options are in the plan with
which you are dealing and the correct way to identify
the marital portion. You should possess enough expertise
about these assets so that nothing gets overlooked.
If you use a domestic relations order for distribution
purposes, your settlement agreement should clearly spell
out the terms of the order including what is to happen
in the event of death. There are many options in distributing
these assets so you can expect lengthy negotiations if
your opposing counsel is also knowledgeable. But these
issues should be able to be worked out in negotiation
and not litigation. Unfortunately, there are still many
judges who have very limited retirement asset knowledge.
Going into court with these issues unsettled can be a
crap shoot and not to the advantage of your client. Frankly,
in most cases it should be avoided at all cost.
A quick primer on preparing your case if retirement
assets are to be included would be:
1. Get a signed release form (a sample form can be found
at the end of this newsletter) from your opposing counsel’s
client so you can deal with the plan directly. Do not
rely upon the information provided by your client’s mate.
2. Read the information provided and educate yourself
on the plan provisions so you can intelligently negotiate.
3. Get any appraisals needed as quickly as possible
so you know the worth of the assets and can prepare for
negotiations forearmed with these values. Your proposed
property settlement agreement can then reflect their
true worth. Be very specific in the property settlement
agreement because this is your only shot at correctly
dealing with these issues. Even if you don’t win in all
the negotiations, you have documented your attempt to
correctly get your client everything to which he or she
is entitled. This is particularly important if a domestic
relations order is to be used as a settlement tool.
4. If you have any trepidation about preparing the retirement
asset section of the settlement agreement get an expert
to write it. It is cheap insurance for both you and your
client.
Valuing and distributing the other assets is usually
much less complex. Cars, houses, brokerage accounts,
etc. have fairly easily obtainable values and how they
are to be distributed is usually worked out by the parties
to the case. Both attorneys should agree at the outset
to get their clients to sign information release forms
for retirement assets, brokerage accounts, bank accounts,
employment records, etc. to avoid costly and time consuming
discovery motions.
Usually, only when one of the attorneys is ignorant
(usually of the retirement issues) should you wind up
in litigation. Most information can be obtained by deposition
or discovery and the need for litigation should be very
limited. If you have a strong belief that one of the
parties is hiding assets, even after you have completed
your depositions and discovery motions or if your opposing
counsel is just a jerk who refuses to cooperate in negotiations,
litigation may be your only option. But it should not
be litigation to get your client more than he or she
deserves under the law but simply to ensure that equity
is obtained. This is the intent of the law and the ethical
thing to do.
These goals are not those of a “hired gunfighter” but
the goals of someone seeking justice for their client.
Divorces are not to be won or lost but rather equitably
settled.
RETIREMENT ASSET RELEASE FORM
I, ________________________________________, do hereby
instruct a representative of
(Plan Participant - printed)
____________________________________________________________________________
(Name – address – phone # of benefits provider)
_____________________________________________________________________________
to cooperate fully with ___________________________________________________________
(Name of attorney - address - phone #)
_________________________________________________ or
his/her designee and answer any and all questions relating
to my pension plan or any other retirement or deferred
income plans in which I participate. I also request that
you furnish this individual a current plan booklet and
a current accrued benefits statement, and a statement
as of ___________________________,
(Marital Property Cut-off Date)
of all of my accrued retirement benefits including any
defined contribution, defined benefit or deferred compensation
plans in which I am a participant. The defined benefit
plan statements should detail the accrued vested benefit
payable to me on my normal retirement date along with
a statement of projected pension benefits, including
supplemental benefits, if any, payable to me on the earliest
date that I may receive them on an actuarially unreduced
basis (based on my current income) assuming continued
employment to that date. If my benefit is contingent
upon my classification or job level or contribution level
please so state and advise what that may be. Also, please
provide a statement showing my service computation date
(first day of employment), dates of all breaks in service
(if any), my current salary and my annual salary for
the past five years, the legal names of the plans in
which I participate and their addresses and the name,
address and telephone number of the person to be contacted
if additional information is needed. I authorize that
person to answer all questions incident to this request.
The defined contribution plan statements should show
my current plan balances as well as my account balances
on
____________________________ and on ____________________________.
(Marital Property Cut-off Date)
(Date of Marriage)
_________________________________________ ______________________________
Signature of Plan Participant Today’s
Date
_____________________________________ __________________________
Date of Birth
Social Security #
______________________________ ___________________________
Witness # 1 - Signature
Witness # 2 - Signature
______________________________ ___________________________
Witness # 1 - printed Witness
# 2 – printed
Mr. Commerford has been active in the
valuation of pensions and the preparation of Domestic Relations
Orders for his attorney clients since the founding of LawDATA,
Inc. in 1984. He has presented Continuing Legal Education
Sessions dealing with the valuation and distribution of
retirement assets incident to divorce cases for State Bar
Associations throughout the country and written many articles
on the subject for legal publications.
If you have any questions or ideas for upcoming articles
you can reach Paul Commerford at paul@lawdatainc.com.