Practice
Tip of the Month
How to avoid the embarrassment of negotiating a settlement
using a domestic relations order when the plan provider refuses
to recognize or comply with a domestic relations order?
It seems almost unbelievable today, but it is possible to
run into plan providers who refuse to comply with a domestic
relations order. In most cases these will be public employers,
but there are also many labor union and executive plans that
are not subject to compliance with ERISA rules. The Indiana
Retirement System, which covers State employees, refuses to
honor orders because they feel they are contradictory to State
law barring liens on retirement assets for public employees.
Obviously, this could be changed by the State legislature but
unless there is some kind of action on the part of an organized
lobbying group, concerned with the welfare of former spouses,
this is not going to happen. Many members of labor unions have
retirement savings or annuity plans that are exempt from the
rules of ERISA and IRS (non-complying plans) as do companies
who provide special plans for highly compensated employees.
The trade-off is that these private plans may not always enjoy
the same tax benefits of an ERISA covered plan nor do the employees
always have the same level of protection for their funds, but
the plan providers have much more freedom.
In the case of the public plans, they are exempt from federal
ERISA compliance by law, so it will take a state appellate
level case law change, or the legislature, to bring these plans
into compliance with the existing state statutes which recognize
retirement assets as marital property subject to either equitable
distribution or community property laws. In Florida, the State
public employee plans and most county plans recognize domestic
relations orders but there are a number of cities (i.e., Miami
Beach (not Miami), Hollywood, etc. who refuse to do so. Again,
only a concerted effort on the part of interest groups will
bring about any change.
As an attorney, before you include any retirement asset in
your settlement negotiations, first check with the plan to
verify that they will accept orders. If you have prepared orders
for a plan provider in the past and had them accepted, check
again. Many providers are in the process of changing their
benefit packages. Also, many States have defined benefit plans
for employees for which they will accept orders but also have
non-complying contributory retirement savings annuity plans
that are not subject to orders. Always satisfy yourself that
what you propose to do is doable.
Introductory Special!
Free Pension Appraisal
If you are an attorney
who has never used our services, then let us prepare a
free pension appraisal (a $150.00 value that will be paid
for by your client) so that we can demonstrate to you the
outstanding support and expertise we provide to every one
of our attorney/clients. We make this offer knowing that
once you try us you will become a regular customer.
Getting A Domestic Relations Order Implemented Without Writing An Order
Not many attorneys are aware that in some special situations
involving federal and military pensions it is possible to
structure the final decree with enough specificity to avoid
the drafting of a separate order. This would apply to Uniformed
Services Former Spouse’s Protection Act Orders and Domestic
Relations Orders directed to federal employers. There are
many more federal non-military plans than just the U.S. Civil
Service and Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). The
U.S. State Department has a plan as does the U.S. Public
Health Service and I am sure other agencies, of which I have
never heard, that have there own special plans.
In order to avoid the preparation of a separate order you
must first contact the agency and get from them their requirements
for acceptance of a domestic relations order. Each plan has
their own. The military requires numerous specific recitations
in the final decree and the completion of a number of Department
of Defense forms by the alternate payee before they will
implement the order. But they will do so without a separate
Uniformed Services Former Spouse’s Protection Act Order if
all the ducks are in a row. The Federal Office of Personnel
Management has a large handbook that can be purchased that
covers every conceivable situation dealing with U.S. Civil
Service and FERS plans. The Federal Thrift Plan is managed
separately, so you will have to get their guidelines if a
Thrift Plan is included in the distribution.
The benefit to your client is that he or she will not have
to incur the expense of the preparation of a separate order.
Obviously, this will mean more work for you if you usually
have a service prepare the order and pass on the expense
to your client, but as we all know, there are occasions when
getting paid is doubtful, and paying for the preparation
of the order by a service, out of your own pocket, may just
be money you will never see again.
Even though the plan provider is providing you with their
guidelines, it is probably not a good idea for you to try
to structure the final decree to meet their specifications,
while protecting the interests of your client at the same
time, if you are not comfortable drafting domestic relations
orders. That exercise can turn into a nightmare, as many
agencies will not pre-approve a final decree and if the decree
is rejected by the plan you will have to go back for an amended
final decree which seems a little riskier than going back
to the judge with some changes in a domestic relations order
to meet the plan’s requirements. Also, many clients do not
like their dirty laundry being aired to their employer as
can be the case when the whole final decree is submitted.
I am giving away some trade secrets here but if you employ
an expert to write your settlement language dealing with
the retirement asset distributions, you can advise that you
want to include all the language necessary to incorporate
into the settlement that will meet the guidelines of the
plan to accept the incorporated settlement agreement in the
final decree as a domestic relations order. Not all will
do this, and most will charge more than they usually charge
for just the settlement language, but it will be much cheaper
than preparing a separate order after or coincident with
the final decree.
Whether or not you ever attempt to incorporate a federal domestic
relations order in your final decree is up to you. It really
depends on how comfortable you are working in the area of pensions
and defined contribution accounts. Also, some plans, like
the U.S. Military Reserve or the National Guard, are going
to take a little basic arithmetic skill to figure out what
the non-participant spouse would be entitled to receive under
the point system they use to compute a pension. But, as necessity
is the mother of invention, at least you know that if the financial
need presents itself, under certain circumstances, there are
alternatives to drafting a separate order.
Contact Information
Mr. Commerford has been active in the valuation
of pensions and the preparation of Domestic Relations Orders
for his attorney clients since the founding of LawDATA, Inc.
in 1984. He has presented Continuing Legal Education Sessions
dealing with the valuation and distribution of retirement assets
incident to divorce cases for State Bar Associations throughout
the country and written many articles on the subject for legal
publications.
If you have any questions or ideas for upcoming
articles you can reach Paul Commerford at paul@lawdatainc.com.
Register or Remove Yourself from
the Newsletter List:
http://www1.divorcenet.com/newsletter01/subscribe.html
The Divorce, Pensions and Retirement Benefits Newsletter
is published by: www.divorcenet.com.
Copyright © 2006 Lawtek
Media Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
|