|Home| |Site Map| |Chat| |List of Forums| |Search Site|

Family Law AdvisorŪ
Articles


Negotiating Custody
Things to Consider


It may be obvious where the kids should live. You and your spouse may know who is most suited to have primary responsibility. But, if you don't, and you want to avoid wasting unnecessary time on litigation, these ideas should help you make a good decision. Who gets along best with the children? Is one of the parents more patient? Who makes sure their homework is done? Who talks to their teachers? Who gets up in the night when the kids are sick? Who usually takes them to the doctor, and makes sure they get their medicine when they get back home? Who knows what they like to eat, and when? In short, who is most familiar with the childrens' schedule and daily requirements?

I have been in several custody situations when the lawyers' questions may have seemed ridiculous to an objective observer. Questions like "how many times has he/she changed the child's diapers?" or "what toys does your child like the best" are examples. The judge may want to yawn and stretch during this kind of testimony, and it can get tedious. But, the main point is a good one. The person who is most intimately involved with the child's daily care is probably the parent they should live with. Other factors, too can be important to older children. A twelve year old boy whose father is involved in his sports activities may be better able to provide a close relationship then a mother who is not so involved. A young boy whose mother is the den master of his cub scout troop may not be ready to cut the apron strings. Teenagers may be better off with the more authoritative parent if they have discipline problems. However, if they don't get along with the disciplinarian, and any violence is present, then the other parent may provide more appropriate care. If all other things are equal, other practicalities can come into play. If one parent is staying in the community with which the child is most comfortable and familiar, then his/her adjustment may be better fostered by that parent. If one parent is significantly better off then the other, finances may be an important factor in choosing the child's home.

Don't view custody as a win/loose situation. It is your childrens' needs you should consider, not your own. No matter who the kids live with primarily, the other parent can make excellent and important contributions to the child's rearing, no matter where the child actually lives. both parents should make a concerted effort to give their best to their kids, no matter where their physical location.

DIFFERENT KINDS OF CUSTODY

When I discuss joint custody with my clients, many begin with the idea that the children will live with each parent half of the time. I have seen these kinds of situations approved by courts, but they are not necessarily in the child's best interest. Small children do better when their lives are consistent. They are happier when they know when they can expect to eat, go to bed, or who will be getting them up in the morning. They just aren't that flexible. Routine is a prime source of their sense of security, and systematically uprooting them can be confusing, if not downright disruptive. Visitation with younger children should be more frequent, but for shorter periods of time. They really do feel safer sleeping in their own beds at night.

Older children may be able to adjust better to constantly changing homes. But, it is still confusing to them, especially when school is in session. They are better able to be away from their primary care takers for longer periods of time, and do not find it as disruptive to stay somewhere else for a few days a month. If their parents do not live in the same state, visitation might be less frequent, but for much longer periods of time. Summer vacations, Christmas, Thanksgiving and Easter vacations may be a great time for them to make up for their lost time with the out of state parent.

The periods of time with each parent have little to do with legal custody. There are two kinds of custody. Joint custody implies that the parents can swallow their differences to make important child rearing decisions together. This is the best approach psychologically. Done in good faith by both parties, neither parent looses. A noncustodial father may be happy to help pay for baseball or summer camp if he had a hand in deciding that the child should engage in the activity. A mother who participates in the decision to get braces for the child will be much more willing to pay her share of the expenses. And, lets face it, we all have to get away sometimes. Who better to take care of the children when the custodian needs a break then the other parent? Joint custody can work, and work well when it is approached in a mature cooperative spirit. It tells the children that the people in charge of them are intelligent and caring, rather then confrontational and disputive. The ability to present a solid front in matters of school, church and discipline can help parents avoid being played off against each other by kids whose confusion may cause them to be manipulative. In short, if it can be done, it should be.

Unfortunately, there are situations when joint custody just won't work. Parents who are too interested in control can make the sharing of authority difficult, and nerve racking for the children. If the other parent uses his/her joint custody power to say no to any suggestion proffered by the other parent can deprive the children of things that are genuinely good for them. In these situations, the parents' inability to be respectful to each other forces the kids to make decisions they should not have to make. With sole custody, one parent has the authority to govern the childrens' upbringing. He/she decides their religious training, their schooling, and their activities. The non-custodian just visits, and can be inclined to be over indulgent to try and win the childrens' first loyalty for themselves.

Sometimes, sole custody is a necessary evil. But, even if you and the other parent don't see eye to eye, you can learn to parent your children as a team. A good mental health provider should be able to offer suggestions on how to make decisions together without rehashing your unsuccessful marriage through your parenting. After a divorce, you don't have to make your lives together. But, both of you are obliged to make your childrens' lives as happy and productive as you can. If you can't do that together, it is your children who will most keenly feel the loss.

VISITATION

Visitation is a precious time for both non-custodial parents and their children. It should be a time for the parent to catch up on their kids lives. Talk about school and other activities that are important to them. Don't feel like you have to play Santa Claus. Fun activities are fine, but too often, they are used as a lure, instead as a chance to visit. Don't ask your kids about the custodial parent. It is not their duty to spy for you. If you have a question, and it is your business, ask the other parent. Show up for visitation when you are supposed to. Don't be late. Your kids have been looking forward to seeing you for days. When you don't appear, they can only conclude that they weren't important enough for you to make the effort. Bring them home when you are supposed to. don't make them worry about the other parent's worrying about them just to make a point. Don't send them home in filthy clothes, not fed and nervous just to get under the other parents' skin. It won't help you bridge the parent gap with your ex, and it certainly can't enhance your childrens' respect for you.

If you are the custodial parent, take some of the same medicine. Have the kids ready for the non-custodian when he/she is supposed to pick them up. Don't use pick up and delivery times to complain to the other parent about his/her shortcomings. Don't make your kids anxious by making it clear you really don't trust the other parent. don't make the kids feel guilty about wanting to see the other parent by acting like you are disappointed that they will be gone for awhile. The non-custodian and the children are entitled to privacy. So, don't pump the kids for information about their activities with the other parent, his/her home, his/her significant other, or anything else which would normally be considered a part of his/her private life. Your kids should feel free to be with each of you. Visitation should be a happy occasion for them, not something they have to get through because a judge says they must.

-- Lucille P. Uttermohlen, Attorney at law


Indiana State Resource Directory

Family Law AdvisorŪ Home Page

© 1999 LawTek Media Group, LLC
all rights reserved


www.divorcenet.com/in/in-art03.html