|Home| |Site Map| |Chat| |List of Forums| |Search Site|

Family Law Advisor®

The Divorce, Alimony, and Custody Reporter


Volume 2 Issue 2
March 1996


Inside This Issue


Attacking No-Fault Divorce

Dear Reader:

We humans have an irrepressible need to blame. If there are too many divorces, we blame “bad” spouses or “bad” laws such as no-fault divorces.

Critics argue that a no-fault divorce is the equivalent of a quick, easy divorce. Yet few divorcing couples find divorce simple or fast, despite no-fault divorce laws.

“Family value” proponents fail to recognize the complexities of the marital relationship when they argue for the elimination of no-fault divorces. They want a quick fix -- the same impulse they criticize in their friends and neighbors who ask courts for no-fault divorces.

The elimination of no-fault divorce will not prolong marriage; it will prolong divorce.

Sharyn T. Sooho
Steven L. Fuchs
Law Offices of Sharyn T. Sooho
Two Newton Place, Suite 200
Newton, MA 02158-1634
voice:(617) 969-1400
fax:(617) 964-1694


Back to Table of Contents

When Millions Are not Enough for Two

The Hess family of Switzerland and New Mexico accumulated five hundred million dollars in assets around the world. The parties recently ended up in a New Mexico divorce court after more than twenty years of marriage.

The wife challenged the validity of a Swiss marriage contract denying her a share of the family business. The New Mexico court upheld the contract, but her lawyer says the fight has not ended yet; the parties are still waiting for the judge’s ruling on Mrs. Hess’ alimony claim.

As of early March 1996, Mr. Hess paid legal fees for his wife in excess of what “would comfortably support 50 New Mexico families,” according to his lawyer as quoted in the Albuquerque Monthly.


Back to Table of Contents

Slashing Fees

Why are lawyers so damned expensive? We defer to the economists for an answer. Instead we offer some resources to lower the cost of legal services.

Referral services maintain lists of lawyers willing to accept reduced fee cases for low and moderate income clients.

When looking for free or reduced fee lawyers, try calling:

Read various materials for non-lawyers published by bar associations for information on local divorce laws. Sphinx Publishing of Clearwater, Florida (1-800-226-5291) publishes do-it-yourself divorce books for the following states: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, and Texas.

Nolo Press of Berkeley, California (1-800-992-6656) has several do-it- yourself books for California.

Cheapest source of information: divorce court is usually open to the public, so visit your local courthouse. Observe the judge in action. Get a sense of the courtroom atmosphere, protocol and the judge’s likes and dislikes. In other words, do your homework, and learn what it takes to represent yourself or how to pick the right lawyer.

Back to Table of Contents

Rare, but Necessary: Divorce Trials (part one of two)

The following is an overview of divorce procedure and law. Although most divorce cases settle before trial, clients often cannot tell at the outset whether their cases will settle or got to trial, so knowing what to expect may help settle the case or inc rease the odds of doing better at trial.

Divorce courts weight evidence on many factors before dividing assets or awarding alimony, Judges often consider:

  1. length of your marriage.
  2. conduct of parties.
  3. age of parties.
  4. health of parties.
  5. life style.
  6. occupations.
  7. amounts and sources of income.
  8. vocational skills.
  9. employability.
  10. assets and liabilities.
  11. needs.
  12. opportunity of parties to acquire future capital assets and income.
  13. contribution toward the acquisition, preservation, and appreciation of marital assets.
  14. contribution of parties as homemaker to the family.
  15. unmet needs of the children.

Contrary to popular belief, your spouse’s bad conduct is not necessarily the most important factor, so be prepared to give your lawyer plenty of information on every other topic.

As you prepare for trial, if you are in a unfamiliar with family finances, court rules permit inquiry or “discovery” into your spouse’s finances with:

After gathering and evaluating your spouse’s responses and documents, consider making an offer of settlement. If you and your spouse fail to settle, ask the court for a pre-trial conference. The judge meets with you, your lawyer, your spouse, and your spouse’s lawyer and usually gives a preliminary assessment of the case to help you settle. If you still cannot settle, ask for a trial date.
(Part 2 of the series describes a typical divorce trial.)

Back to Table of Contents

Out of Line with On-line Romance?

Is there such a thing as safe sex on the Internet? A recent New Jersey divorce case asks whether a man and woman who never met can commit adultery in Cyberspace. Both parties were married when they met on the Internet, fell in love, and exchanged a series of sexually-charged communiqués.

The woman’s husband read the on-line exchanges, discovered that his wife planned to meet her on-line companion in person, and filed for divorce on the ground of adultery.

The wife in turn claimed the husband violated her privacy, even though he had legitimate access to the e-mail address.

In all probability the court will not give serious scrutiny to either party’s claim, leaving unanswered any questions about divorce, privacy, and the Internet for another day.

Back to Table of Contents

International Custody: Fights and Flights

Why should divorcing parents be concerned about global politics? In 1993 Congress enacted the International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act, another tool for parents whose children are kidnapped and removed from the United States by the other parent. The 1993 statute responds to the steadily increasing numbers of international kidnappings. In 1987, the Justice Department reported 320 cases. In 1992, there were 515 new cases.

Custody is a complex matter, in part because our society is mobile. Prior to 1968, a disgruntled parent could leave one state with the children, and ask a new state to consider a new request for custody and visitation in complete disregard for the first state’s orders. In 1968, lawmakers attempted to end “forum shopping” by requiring all custody matters to be handled by the child’s “home state.” Subsequent laws compel all fifty states to recognize the primacy of the home state’s custody orders.

In 1988, Congress implemented the Hague Convention on International Parental Child Abduction. Finally, in 1993, Congress added criminal penalties to parental abduction of children across international borders.

Here are some tips for left-behind parents and their lawyers trying to locate and retrieve children after reporting the adduction to the local police, U.S. State Department and FBI:


Back to Table of Contents

A Few of Our Favorite Things

A word to the wise:

“When an opposing lawyer is impugning your integrity, is making attacks, you shouldn’t be standing there rising to the bait, yelling back. Be quiet. Judges know what’s going on. We may not look like we do because we’re sitting there so impassively...We are not stupid.” Eileen Shaevel, Judge, Flaschner Judicial Institute, Report of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court Bench/Bar Conference, April 8, 1995

Words of inspiration from a Japanese folk tale:

“A bear chases a samurai over the edge of a cliff. As the samurai falls, he grabs a branch moments before landing in the open jaws of a lion. The ferocious bear remains at the edge of the cliff. The samurai looks up and sees two groundhogs gnawing at the branch, and then spots a clump of wild strawberries. With his free hand he reaches for the biggest red berry, puts it in his mouth, savors the taste and says contentedly, ‘Ah, delicious!’”
-- Iris Morikawa Caslin, family and juvenile law attorney


Go to our Home Page

Family Law Advisor®


©1996 LawTek Media Group, Inc.

all rights reserved

(This document is considered "advertising" under Supreme Court Rule 3:07)