|Home| |Site Map| |Chat||List of Forums| |Search Site|
DivorceNet Logo

Please visit this month's sponsor:
Qualified Domestic Relations Orders Answers! Click Here!


ETHICS SPOTLIGHT


An Attorney’s Ethical Duties in His or Her Own Divorce Case

Laura W. Morgan,
Senior Attorney for Family Law, National Legal Research Group
Executive Editor, Divorce Litigation


This month we’ll take another look at an attorney’s ethical duties in his or her own divorce case.  We looked at this issue before, in the May 1998 Ethics Spotlight.  See also Louis Parley, The Ethical Family Lawyer 161-167 (1995).

In Vickery v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, No. 14-97-00586-CV (Tex. Ct. App. 14th Dist. July 29, 1999), Glenn W. Vickery persuaded his wife Helen to go along with a divorce in order to shield some of their assets from a possible legal malpractice judgment.  Vickery arranged for a colleague, Dianne Richards, to represent Helen.  Unbeknownst to Helen, Vickery and Richards were acting in concert to deprive Helen of as much community property as possible and have Helen waive as many rights as possible.  He misrepresented some of the facts needed for the divorce and  omitted valuable assets from the property division.

As soon as the divorce was final, Vickery married one of Helen’s close friends, and then tried to evict Helen from the marital residence.  When Helen retained new counsel to overturn the divorce decree, Vickery asked another colleague, Allyn Hoagland, to convey to Helen a proposed settlement agreement, even though Vickery knew Helen was represented by counsel.  Hoagland told Helen if she didn’t settle, Vickery might have her prosecuted for an alleged burglary of his townhouse.

After Helen obtained a judgment against Vickery, she complained to the disciplinary committee.  The court found that Vickery committed multiple ethical violations, including: (1) causing Hoagland to communicate with Helen despite the knowledge she was represented by counsel; (2) threatening Helen with criminal charges to gain an advantage in a civil matter; (3) inducing Richards to represent to violate the rule against representing opposing parties; (4) misrepresentation of factual matters in the divorce pleadings.

Laura W. Morgan is a Senior Attorney in Family Law at the National Legal Research Group, in Charlottesville, Virginia, a firm that writes memoranda and briefs for attorneys nationwide. Ms. Morgan is the author of "Child Support Guidelines: Interpretation and Application," and is currently Chair of the Child Support Committee of the American Bar Association Family Law Section. She can be reached at: goddess@supportguidelines.com, or phone 1-800-727-6574 or 1-804-977-5690


© 1999 National Legal Research Group
and LawTek Media Group, LLC
all rights reserved

No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.

FAM-LAW-LIT: A SURVEY OF CURRENT PERIODICAL
LITERATURE ADDRESSING FAMILY LAW ISSUES

Family Law Advisor® HOME PAGE

Lawyer-to-Lawyer

http://www.divorcenet.com/famlaw/famlaw-ethics06-99.html