DivorceNet®

Go back to Home » states

A Public Service of

Click Here for Glen L. Rabenn, Esq., Certified Family Law Specialist
Glen L. Rabenn, Esq.,
Certified Family Law Specialist

Seal Beach, CA

(Sponsors' postings are not to be construed as legal advice and do not constitute an attorney-client relationship.)
Because of the open nature of this board, parties other than our Sponsors may be responding to posts.
(A local attorney should be consulted for matters of law.)

Zipcode Search
Enter your zip code for professionals in your area:
Who's Online
2 registered (Belle5, dvd), 7 Guests and 6 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
coopercat, lonecanyonrider, shanta, toons1, CWFL
25002 Registered Users
Forum Stats
25002 Members
76 Forums
25095 Topics
225383 Posts

Max Online: 201 @ 09/13/09 12:39 AM
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#23 - 05/18/03 03:16 PM Welcome
Anonymous
Unregistered


Welcome to DivorceNet®'s new bulletin boards.

Before being able to post messages, you must register for a new username. Your browser must be configured to allow "cookies" at least from divorcenet.com. You may not use HTML or UBBcode in your posts.

Note: If you post a message, your IP address will appear along with the message.

Top
#24 - 08/13/03 10:39 AM Re: Welcome
misfit Offline
New User

Registered: 08/12/03
Posts: 2
HI ,
I posted a message yesterday but it did not show . Do I need to register a new user name as your message
indicates? And also, how do I do this? Thanks!

Top
#25 - 07/12/05 11:55 AM Re: Welcome
gforester Offline
Member

Registered: 07/11/05
Posts: 8
This site is a community service everyone involved with it has a right to be proud to be a partisapant espically those that burden the cost of its operation.

Top
#26 - 07/12/05 01:35 PM Re: Welcome
community_mod Administrator Offline
Community Moderator
Veteran
***

Registered: 12/31/69
Posts: 1255
Loc: MA
That is very kind of you to say Gforester. I'm glad you find the site useful. Please let me know if I can help you with anything while you are here!

Sincerely,
Shawna

Top
#204222 - 09/09/08 11:09 PM Re: time share [Re: community_mod]
FITZHEAD50 Offline
New User

Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 4
We have been thought ventura ca courts Med re: Child cosd. The Med. req. every other week plus tues with father. it is a 62-32 slpit. He wants more time and is trying to fight it. He has been Arested for 2-DV charges 1-was diss the other was pled down. What is his chances of getting more time share.

Top
#204223 - 09/09/08 11:12 PM Re: time share [Re: FITZHEAD50]
FITZHEAD50 Offline
New User

Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 4
Re: time share [Re: community_mod]
FITZHEAD50 FITZHEAD50
New User


Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 1 We have been thought ventura ca courts Med re: Child cosd. The Med. req. every other week plus tues with father. it is a 62-32 slpit. He wants more time and is trying to fight it. He has been Arested for 2-DV charges 1-was diss the other was pled down. What is his chances of getting more time share.

Top
#204224 - 09/09/08 11:13 PM Re: time share [Re: FITZHEAD50]
FITZHEAD50 Offline
New User

Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 4
 Originally Posted By: FITZHEAD50
Re: time share [Re: community_mod]
FITZHEAD50 FITZHEAD50
New User


Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 1 We have been thought ventura ca courts Med re: Child cosd. The Med. req. every other week plus tues with father. it is a 62-32 slpit. He wants more time and is trying to fight it. He has been Arested for 2-DV charges 1-was diss the other was pled down. What is his chances of getting more time share.

Top
#204257 - 09/10/08 12:19 PM Re: time share [Re: FITZHEAD50]
FITZHEAD50 Offline
New User

Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 4
 Originally Posted By: FITZHEAD50
 Originally Posted By: FITZHEAD50
Re: time share [Re: community_mod]
FITZHEAD50 FITZHEAD50
New User


Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 1 We have been thought ventura ca courts Med re: Child cosd. The Med. req. every other week plus tues with father. it is a 62-32 slpit. He wants more time and is trying to fight it. He has been Arested for 2-DV charges 1-was diss the other was pled down. What is his chances of getting more time share.

Top
#204260 - 09/10/08 12:45 PM Re: time share [Re: FITZHEAD50]
BeaverFever Offline
Superstar
***

Registered: 11/29/04
Posts: 6787
Loc: Houston, TX
Can you start your own thread for this?

Top
#209130 - 12/04/08 08:30 PM Re: time share [Re: BeaverFever]
jim_in_iowa Offline
New User

Registered: 12/04/08
Posts: 1
I’m hoping for some advice from a Californian. My daughter’s mom moved her to California without getting court permission, in fact, I didn’t find out about the move until after the move. Mom kept it secret. My family court jurisdiction is in Nebraska, but I am now living in Iowa. Iowa is a very progressive state compared to Nebraska and I am certain that I would have a stronger voice in Iowa. However, the Nebraska family court would never approve a transfer of jurisdiction to Iowa as that is not where mom lives. Mom makes $175K to my $70K, but travel expenses were ruled to be my sole burden from the start. I took that to the State Supreme court and I lost. Ironically, the only Supreme Court judge to be on my side was the sole woman on that panel of judges.

In Nebraska I never encountered a judge that wasn’t still living in the ‘70’s. I went through some very rough times and those judges’ rulings only accomplished one thing and that was to bend to the wishes of a narcissistic mom. She crucified me and the courts were her willing enablers and she created 9 years of legal entanglement that has cost me over $50,000.

My question to this forum is should I transfer jurisdiction to California? The laws in Nebraska are written such that, basically, a judge can override everything and anything pertaining to those laws. In NE fathers are guilty of being a bad parent until proven innocent. There is no such thing as accountability. A judge’s rulings go unquestioned and are nearly always upheld in higher courts. Under what is opposite to what should be my civil rights and when hearsay rules the day and when mom can lie and it is accepted without supporting evidence then guilt or innocence becomes irrelevant. A daughters need to have a close and meaningful relationship with her father becomes irrelevant. "Best Interest of the Child" is just a warm and fuzzy thing to put into "law".

In my 9 years of legal entanglement it seems to boil down to which judge you get. In my jurisdiction the judges have held their appointments for decades. As far as I can tell they have never been challenged to do anything other than what they have been doing for decades. I'm a good person, but I feel like convicts in our prisons have more civil rights than I do.


Through my experiences I am scared to death of filing one single document to gain more rights as I usually lose more than I gain. Can I get a fair shake in CA?

Thanks for reading this and many thanks if you reply.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >


Moderator:  community_mod, JDunn 


Home | List of Forums | Search Site | Legal Forms
© 2004 LawTek Media Group, LLC all rights reserved

Attention: Bulletin Board Terms of Use : Please read
Disclaimer: No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.