DivorceNet®

Go back to Home » states

A Public Service of

Click Here for Law Offices of Sharyn T. Sooho
Law Offices of Sharyn T. Sooho

Newton, MA
(Sponsors' postings are not to be construed as legal advice and do not constitute an attorney-client relationship.)
Because of the open nature of this board, parties other than our Sponsors may be responding to posts.
(A local attorney should be consulted for matters of law.)

Zipcode Search
Enter your zip code for professionals in your area:
Who's Online
3 registered (BaffledMom, Belle5, 1 invisible), 14 Guests and 16 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
coopercat, lonecanyonrider, shanta, toons1, CWFL
25002 Registered Users
Forum Stats
25002 Members
76 Forums
25096 Topics
225387 Posts

Max Online: 201 @ 09/13/09 12:39 AM
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#227640 - 11/03/09 08:20 PM The New Art of Alimony
YoMass Offline
Member

Registered: 01/13/06
Posts: 38
Did anybody read the Oct 31st Wall St. Journal special report on alimony? It detailed several cases in Massachusetts, with one, a 17-year marriage ended in divorce in 1982. Both parties waived right to past, present and future alimony. Yet, 25 years later, ex-wife had financial problems, and sued ex-husband (retired with a pension) for alimony. She won $400./wk for five years, with a lifetime $250./wk thereafter. Under Massachusetts law, judges who want to keep a person off public services can turn to the ex-spouse. Scary stuff, indeed!

Top
#227648 - 11/04/09 07:26 AM Re: The New Art of Alimony [Re: YoMass]
LatteFiend Offline
Expert
****

Registered: 05/18/03
Posts: 719
Loc: Massachusetts
No kidding. When I got my agreement, my attorney told me in MA you really can't ask for a specific time limit on alimony - we had to fight tooth and nail to get a clause in that alimony would be reviewable even. Ugh...

Top
#227712 - 11/05/09 03:01 PM Re: The New Art of Alimony [Re: LatteFiend]
grasshopper Offline
Member
*

Registered: 11/03/03
Posts: 233
Greetings,

The Public Radio station in Boston, WBUR, aired a show on this article which was eye opening to say the least.

The show guests included:

- Jennifer Levitz, staff writer for The Wall Street Journal, the lady who wrote the article for the Wall Street Journal.
- Danaya Wright, professor at the University of Floirda Levin School of Law, where she teaches a course in the history of family law.
- Douglas Dougherty, practices family law at Dougherty, Hanneman & Snedaker, LCC in Columbus, Ohio.

You can hear an archive of the show at http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/11/til-death-does-he-pay

Reminds me of the horror stories ab CS in The Peoples Republic of Massachusetts.

You can read the full story at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703399204574505700448957522.html

Regards,

Grasshopper
_________________________
They may forget what you said, but they will never forget how you made them feel. - Carl W. Buechner


Top
#227797 - 11/07/09 05:07 PM Re: The New Art of Alimony [Re: grasshopper]
YoMass Offline
Member

Registered: 01/13/06
Posts: 38
Let's zero in on the poor chap highlighted in the first paragraph. Ex nailed him for lifetime alimony--even though he had retired, and both had sworn off alimony at time of divorce...
Would we see the same shameful result if he had moved out of People's Republic of Massachusetts--to a more conservative state?
What if penniless ex had moved out the Peoples Republic?
What if our tragic hero had emigrated out of People's Republic? All the way out of USA? Yes, an ex-pat.
At the time of my divorce, my attorney assured me alimony based on earnings--therefore, if I had retired...no issue. Perhaps I shouldn't stick around to find out...

Top


Moderator:  community_mod, JDunn 


Home | List of Forums | Search Site | Legal Forms
© 2004 LawTek Media Group, LLC all rights reserved

Attention: Bulletin Board Terms of Use : Please read
Disclaimer: No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.