DivorceNet®

Go back to Home » states

Customized on-line divorce -- fast, affordable and easy
Customized on-line divorce -- fast, affordable and easy

(A local attorney should be consulted for matters of law.)

Zipcode Search
Enter your zip code for professionals in your area:
Who's Online
0 registered (), 4 Guests and 6 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
lonecanyonrider, shanta, toons1, CWFL, EasyDriver
25001 Registered Users
Forum Stats
25001 Members
76 Forums
25095 Topics
225382 Posts

Max Online: 201 @ 09/13/09 12:39 AM
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#217945 - 05/05/09 03:58 PM Re: Unusual Circumstances [Re: BeaverFever]
poorerevryday Offline
Member

Registered: 05/04/09
Posts: 6
Thanks BF. I think I'm arguing more to myself. Really hate to go this route...appreciate your thoughts!

Top
#217946 - 05/05/09 04:06 PM Re: Unusual Circumstances [Re: poorerevryday]
MamaBrown Offline
Member

Registered: 04/09/09
Posts: 155
Neither of the boys live with her at all or am i miss reading that? If neither of them are with her, why are you paying CS at all??
_________________________
Blood might be thicker than Water, but Love is thicker than Blood.

Top
#217948 - 05/05/09 04:23 PM Re: Unusual Circumstances [Re: MamaBrown]
BeaverFever Offline
Superstar
***

Registered: 11/29/04
Posts: 6787
Loc: Houston, TX
"Neither of the boys live with her at all or am i miss reading that?"
You read it correctly.

"If neither of them are with her, why are you paying CS at all??"
The simple answer is: that's what's in the order. Until a judge approves a modification of the order, it stands, whether it reflects changed circumstances or not. He wants the order modified to reflect reality.

Top
#217954 - 05/05/09 05:42 PM Re: Unusual Circumstances [Re: BeaverFever]
HevnMaidMe Offline
Superstar
**

Registered: 12/03/04
Posts: 4058
"I guess the simple question is ... what are my chances on being able to eliminate the $600 child support payment on my son who lives in the group home?"

<~~~looking into my crystal ball, here!

I believe the chances of eliminating the support for your disabled son is excellent.
Now, if your younger son was still residing with her, she would probably have counter filed an upward modification to have the support recalculated for the youngest. Depending upon your current income (assuming it's higher 4 years later), you might have ended up paying somewhere between 600 and 1200 for your second child.

Now that is probably the question that is going to arise in court regarding your younger son. You will probably be asked to bring in financial documentation, at which time the judge might decide to do that recalculation. That's the point in time, the revelation that your son is living with you will come up. If parenting time is already a factor in child support, judge might still allow some to go to her household, but less than 600. If not, you may be advised to file for primary custody change.

Just some scenarios of what could happen. Dang crystal ball is busted and won't tell me for sure! :)
_________________________
When you know better, you do better -- Maya Angelou

Top
#218758 - 05/16/09 06:17 PM Re: Unusual Circumstances [Re: HevnMaidMe]
astrolink Offline
Superstar
***

Registered: 06/03/03
Posts: 5742
I don't know if it's clear to all the posters here, but the original poster is paying $1200/month in support to his ex...none of it is going to the state for the child in the group home. She hasn't had one child for 2 years, and the other for just under a year. He's overpaid over $21,000. What if you did that with your electric company, and they refused to refund it, calling it a gift.....it would be front page news in more than just here; it would be worldwide news. Yet, in family, law, it's just another day.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2


Moderator:  community_mod, JDunn 


Home | List of Forums | Search Site | Legal Forms
© 2004 LawTek Media Group, LLC all rights reserved

Attention: Bulletin Board Terms of Use : Please read
Disclaimer: No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.