|
3 registered (BaffledMom, Belle5, 1 invisible),
14
Guests and
16
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
25002 Members
76 Forums
25096 Topics
225387 Posts
Max Online: 201 @ 09/13/09 12:39 AM
|
|
|
#210977 - 01/12/09 05:07 PM
Dual child support orders
|
Expert
 
Registered: 01/26/05
Posts: 595
Loc: Ft Lewis, WA
|
OK, I am going to post this in the OR and NC (the two states in question) boards, so I can try to get a specific answer from an attorney.....
So, I posted recently about how DH's ex has filed saying that DH owes her $10K + from a NC support order. The paperwork she brought to the CSE office (in OR -0- where the current order is, and has been since Aug 2003) stated that DH was behind on the NC support order from Feb 03-Aug 04.
CSE did their own accounting, based on ex's paperwork, and came up with DH being $6K behind (for the dates of Feb 03-Aug 04). His caseworker is sending us copies of everything, along with the information on how to request a hearing.
Now, here's the thing: There was a NC court order from Feb 2003, in which DH was ordered to pay $1000/month. Then, the OR court made an order, beginning Aug 2003, for $800/month. DFAS (DH's pay goes through them) stopped the NC payments and started paying approximately Sept 2003. What they told DH, at the time, was that the OR order superceded the NC one because it was for the same children and it was newer. So, basically, the NC order no longer existed as OR took over. DH's attorney later confirmed that.
So, my question is: Did the NC stay in effect, even after the OR order started? Did DH owe money to both states? When his ex VOLUNTARILY withdrew her CS/SS case in NC in 2005 (she was STILL going after SS all that time -- even though she had also gotten remarried!), she did not bring up any past due CS, and the case was just closed in NC (we had moved to WA by that time).
Kids never lived in NC. Ex was on welfare in OR. OR Judge agreed that CS should have been done there from the beginning, like DH had kept saying.
His caseworker said they have to do all this based on the party asking for it. Now it would be up to DH to request the hearing, show his evidence, and prove he did not owe it. I'm wondering -- did we get bad advice, way back when, from DFAS and the old attorney? Does he owe for the NC order for that year, even though he was paying on the OR order? Or is ex just trying to "double dip" and get money she is not owed?
Anyone? Anything? Thoughts?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#211557 - 01/17/09 10:51 PM
Re: Dual child support orders
[Re: HevnMaidMe]
|
Expert
 
Registered: 01/26/05
Posts: 595
Loc: Ft Lewis, WA
|
Your most important paperwork is going to be accounting from the DFAS clearly showing payments were continuously made to NC right up to the date the order was changed. I hadn't thought about getting an accounting from DFAS. I will check into that on Tuesday! Thanks. It's also obvious the period of time in question is Feb 03 to Aug 03, not Aug 04 (who came up with Aug. 04???). DH's ex wife gave (in the caseworkers words) "tons of papers" to OR CSE. It took them several days to sift through and organize what she brought them. His ex told OR CSE that the NC order was in effect until Aug 2004!! (Just another lie in her long list of them!) Normally if a CP moves from one state to another and wants the new state to collect support, one of the first things the new CSEU must do is contact the old state and have all the casework file transferred to their unit. The CP (ex) NEVER lived in NC! She lived in OR! She filed for divorce in OR. DH simultaneously filed in NC. She filed for support in OR (actually, the state did, cause she was getting welfare). DH was stationed in NC. Then ex found out that NC does not unpute income (OR does), so she filed for child and spousal support in NC. DH gave OR jurisdiction over himself for support, but kept the divorce case going in NC (it got complicated and convoluted -- believe me!!). Ultimately, NC did the divorce and OR did the custody/parenting time and child support (no spousal support was ordered). Meanwhile, ex kept pushing to get support through NC as part of the divorce (even after she got married and OR had already ruled on the child support!). Finally, we moved to WA state, and DH sent a letter to the court telling them that he was no longer a resident; child support was being handled by OR; and ex got remarried -- so all matters should be removed from the calendar. 6 weeks later, we got a CC of a notice from ex's attorney that he filed, withdrawing all complaints. And, believe me: this guy was a jerk!! If there was money owed, that would have been in the paperwork!! He wouldn't have let it go!!! What's confusing me here is, how in the world could NC "not" know the case was closed in 2003 when they obviously had to transfer it before then? The whole thing is confusing from the word go, because of both states handling different aspects of the case! How is it that BM even had the opportunity to "voluntarily close the NC in 2005?" I think I explained that above.
Edited by JDunn (06/02/09 12:17 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|