DivorceNet®

Go back to Home » states

Roy N. Martin, Attorney and Counselor at Law

Roy N. Martin, Attorney At Law, Roy Martin is a graduate of Johns Hopkins University (Bachelor’s Degree, 1985: Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Math), and of the University of Arizona, (Juris Doctorate, 1996 Magna Cum Laude). Having excelled in law school, graduating 13th in a class of 164, and having served on law review, he chose to practice domestic relations law based on his own personal experience. In his first year of law school, he went through a very difficult divorce. He went back to court to re-litigate custody in his second year of law school. He completed law school while serving as the sole custodian of his two children. He now practices law while raising his children on his own.

(Although Roy Martin is an attorney, he cannot provide legal advice in this Forum. Therefore, the information posted here shall not be deemed legal advice and does not substitute for a thorough legal consultation with a competent domestic relations attorney. Exchanging information with Mr. Martin shall not result in your establishment of an attorney-client relationship with him, nor shall it prevent Mr. Martin from entering an attorney-client relationship with your spouse. Information posted in this Forum is not confidential. Therefore, do not post anything you wouldn't want your spouse, the court, or anyone else to know. Legal information provided by Mr. Martin is specific to the State of Arizona, and shall be presumed invalid in all other jurisdictions.)

Zipcode Search
Enter your zip code for professionals in your area:
Who's Online
3 registered (BaffledMom, Belle5, 1 invisible), 14 Guests and 16 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
coopercat, lonecanyonrider, shanta, toons1, CWFL
25002 Registered Users
Forum Stats
25002 Members
76 Forums
25096 Topics
225387 Posts

Max Online: 201 @ 09/13/09 12:39 AM
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#210880 - 01/10/09 05:51 AM Subpoena
formyson Offline
Member
*

Registered: 08/18/08
Posts: 15
In February of 2008, I filed Failure to Pay Child Support against my ex...got him served after a few games in May. Our first court hearing with the AG was in August, we then went back to the AG in September. We are coming up to another court hearing in front of the Judge. No child support coming in at all. Roughly $15k behind. He is lying all over the place...and I wondered if Subpoena's are hard to do? I would love to see his bank information...Also, I don't know where he is living. It seems he is seperated from his current wife. So it would be difficult to serve him a subpoena. Is it required to serve him? I also wondered with your experience, do they eventually go to jail for non-payment? I am tired of going to court and lies just keep on coming. It just seems like a waste of time.

Top
#210884 - 01/10/09 07:43 AM Re: Subpoena [Re: formyson]
HevnMaidMe Offline
Superstar
**

Registered: 12/03/04
Posts: 4058
Subpoenas are not hard to do, for an attorney. It might be much more difficult for one to try on their own. Any errors in the process might end up having the subpoena thrown out and you want to avoid that. Attorneys can subpoena bank statements from the institutions if necessary. It could be quite expensive and may take some time if the subpoenaed institutions are not immediately responsive.

I recently went through the same situation as you after being ordered by the court to have him personally served. My ex was supposedly separated from his current wife, but also didn't provide a new address/phone. In order to serve him the process server made repeated visits to their marital residence (she kept evading them -- not answering the door, etc.) Finally the process server ending up nailing it to their door as well as snail mailing another copy according to the law. Lo and behold, he showed up in the courtroom a week later.

Now, I don't know if my ex is going to go to jail this time. The judge did ask if I wanted him to, and I said yes. (After more than 10 contempt violations and ex's repeated chances to comply, I didn't have to think twice about saying "yes." Enough is enough. Seems the same judge is fed up too.) A new hearing date is set and he was advised to get an attorney for this one. Now that jail is finally a real threat -- there's the economy issue to deal with too. I'm certain his attorney will find or try to find a way to wrangle him out of this one, and of course since that hearing he's made effort to pay again, but that's his pattern. Make payments until the fire is out, then resume again.
_________________________
When you know better, you do better -- Maya Angelou

Top
#214976 - 03/11/09 08:46 PM Re: Subpoena [Re: HevnMaidMe]
RoyMartin Moderator Offline
AZ Forum Moderator
Member

Registered: 01/28/06
Posts: 157
Child support enforcement is something on which you can spend a lot of money. One has to do a cost/benefit analysis to determine whether it's worth it. Unfortunately, without adequate information, sometimes that analysis involves a lot of guess work. With some people, it's like trying to squeeze blood from a stone. Others have wages to be garnished, assets to be attached, tax refunds to be seized, etc.

Conducting discovery -- which is what issuance of subpoenas is -- can be expensive. Banks will sometimes do their best to avoid complying with subpoenas. If you have an attorney, banks may be more likely to comply. Best of luck.
_________________________
Roy N. Martin, Esq.
Forum Moderator
(520) 628-8900
http://www.creativedivorce.com

Top


Moderator:  community_mod, JDunn, RoyMartin 


Home | List of Forums | Search Site | Legal Forms
© 2004 LawTek Media Group, LLC all rights reserved

Attention: Bulletin Board Terms of Use : Please read
Disclaimer: No information or materials posted here are intended to constitute legal advice, nor can we guarantee the accuracy of posted information, especially as to each individual situation. LawTek does not independently check the information contained herein and does not refer or endorse any product, service, or firm. This site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship; local counsel should always be consulted.